![]() ![]() (eds) Reimagining Climate Change London: Routledge, pp. (2016) ‘The promise of climate fiction: imagination, storytelling, and the politics of the future.’ In Wapner, P. (2020) ‘Critical Worldbuilding: Toward a Geographical Engagement with Imagined Worlds.’ Literary Geographies, 6(1), pp. (2003) Book clubs: Women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Leszczynski, A (2020) ‘Digital Methods III: The digital mundane.’ Progress in Human Geography, 44(6), pp. (2017) ‘To Get Ready for Climate Change, Read Octavia Butler.’ Electra Street. Butler Studies.’ Women's Studies, 48(1), pp. (2019) ‘Emergent Counter- Memories in the Field of Octavia E. (2005) Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions. ![]() and Garforth, L (in preparation) Reimagining climate futures: reading Annihilation. Goldsmiths College, University of London, 15 November. Unpublished talk in Bleeding Edges and Solvent Objects: Racial Capitalism and Urban Technopoetics, Visual Cultures Autumn Public Programme. (2018) Uses of science fiction: everyday readers, ambiguous hopefulness and environmental justice. (2020) ‘The Cube of Loneliness.’ Literary Geographies, 6(1), pp. (2014) Literary Geographies: Narrative Space in Let The Great World Spin. ‘Text as it happens: Literary geography.’ Geography compass, 2(5), pp. (2020) ‘Expanding Climate Science: Using Science Fiction’s Worldbuilding to Imagine a Climate Changed Southwestern U.S.’ Literary Geographies 6(1), pp. (2019) ‘Flourishing amongst the ruins: the productive pastpresentfutures of science fiction feminisms.’ Unpublished talk in London Science Fiction Community Productive Futures conference, 13 September 2019. (2017) ‘Instantiating Imaginactivism: Le Guin’s The Dispossessed as Inspiration.’ Ada: A Journal of New Media & Technology, 12. Mémoires du livre/Studies in Book Culture 3 (2). (2012) ‘#1b1t: Investigating Reading Practices at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. (2016) ‘Troubling ecology: Wangechi Mutu, Octavia Butler, and black feminist interventions in environmentalism.’ Critical Ethnic Studies, 2(1), pp. London: University of Chicago Press.įrazier, C. London: Blackwell.įelski, R (2015) The Limits of Critique. (2019) ‘Faraway, so Close: Seeing the intimacy in Goodreads reviews.’ Qualitative Inquiry, 25(3), pp. (2016) ‘Readers of popular fiction and emotion online.’ In Gelder, K. ![]() (eds) The Palgrave Handbook on Literature and Science. (forthcoming) ‘Reading science: SF and the uses of literature.’ In Wald, P. (2015) Octavia’s Brood: Science Fiction Stories from Social Justice Movements. (2017) ‘Hope without a future in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower.’ In Dawney, L. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.īresnihan, P. Neville plaice, stephen plaice and Paul Knight. (2017) Rethinking utopia: Place, power, affect. Butler.’ Palimpsest: A Journal on Women, Gender, and the Black International, 6(2), pp. (2017) ‘Guest Editors’ Introduction: Palimpsests in the Life and Work of Octavia E. (2019) Character: Three Inquiries in Literary Studies. It builds on recent research with online sf reading communities which is interested in how reading and discussing speculative fiction online is generative for collectively negotiating radically altered presents and futures (see Chambers and Garforth, forthcoming author 2018 a, b and author and Garforth, forthcoming).Īnderson, A., Felski, R. I cautiously suggest that this creative, collaborative, caring sf reading practice constitutes a form of ambiguously hopeful sustenance. In exploring how readers seek out and engage with utopian and critically dystopian fictions that nourish the capacity for individual and collective resistance and struggle, this piece - and the wider project it is part of - seeks to ground some of the claims made by science fiction scholars, about the radical potential of sf (see Moylan, 2000, Jameson, 2005) by attending qualitatively to ordinary reading practices. Through an attentiveness to the knowledge production of readers, it is a modest addition to recent work which seeks to explore the relationship between speculative climate fiction and political change (Milkoreit 2016 Schneider-Mayerson, 2018 Harris, 2020 Yazell 2020). It builds on recent calls for a reinvigorated cultural sociology of reading that is attentive to how ‘the very exposure through fictional texts to the plurality of the human condition, its vulnerability and its strengths, opens up for readers the possibility of conceiving and making sense of change in themselves and their situation’ (Thumala Olave, 2018: 449). This short piece explores the social and situated practices of collectively negotiating speculative fiction over video conferencing software across different time zones. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |